![]() ![]() Ms Clarkson referred questions on conditions at the complex to attorney Stephen Savarese who represents the trailers parkâs owners, William Henckel and The Estate of Penelope Barrett. âWeâre doing whatever we canâ¦Weâre working on it as quickly as we can.â Ms Clarkson acknowledged that the abandoned Unit 6 there is in âdeplorableâ condition. ![]() Ms Clarkson said she visited the complex on April 29 to inspect conditions there. Myriam Clarkson is the spokeswoman for The Renaissance Collaborative, Inc, of New Haven, which is the trailer parkâs management company. ÂMany of the residents living at this park are hard working people that try to keep the park nice, but it is impossible because of how this park is supervised,â the anonymous writers add.Ī brief tour of the facility indicated that many of the mobile homes are well kept, but some others are not. The writers of the letter urged town officials to investigate their concerns and to focus on problems at several mobile homes there, as well as review blight issues posed by deteriorating structures. The letter alleges that the several abandoned mobile homes should be demolished, but have been left standing by the complexâs owners and the facilityâs management company. The anonymous letter also alleges that abandoned mobile homes at the complex have served as âdrug dens/homeless shelters,â that wild animals are using the units as refuge, and that the units smell of urine and feces during the warm weather. A previously faulty water system had required residents to use bottled water. Ms Colbert said that some trailer park residents may not have been aware that the water supply is now considered safe to drink. Water mains have been replaced, a new water storage system has been installed, and the location for a new well has been approved by the state, she added. ![]() ÂThe water has been tested and is currently in compliance with standards, and is safe to drink,â she wrote. In letters received by trailer park residents on April 28, Ms Colbert stated that the owner of the facility âhas made major improvements to the water system in response to deteriorating water mains, water pressure problems, and water quality problems.â Town Health Director Donna Culbert said April 29 that certain improvements have been made to the complexâs common water supply that now make that water safe to drink. We hope to have answers shortly.âĪmong the many complaints listed in the letter, the writers allege that the water supply is undrinkable due to contamination problems. In a statement, Mr Blumenthal said, âWe are reviewing the letter from Meadowbrook Terrace Mobile Home Park residents to determine whether my office or another state agency has the authority to help. ÂFrustrated and concerned residentsâ of the trailer park submitted the April 12 letter to state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal and to local officials. The residents who live there typically own the mobile homes that they occupy and pay a monthly rent for the spaces where those structures are positioned. The 12-acre site has spaces for more than 60 mobile homes. In response to an anonymous letter of complaint submitted to town and state officials concerning allegedly âhideousâ living conditions at the Meadowbrook Terrace Mobile Home Park at 55 Sugar Street (Route 302), town officials say they are taking steps to resolve certain problems there. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() Find duplicate images, audios, videos, documents, packages, etc.It’s ridiculously cheap at roughly €7.50 too.Cisdem Duplicate Finder The Best PhotoSweeper Alternative You can further fine-tune PhotoSweeper’s settings so you really get the most out of it, but even out-of-the-box I found it performing brilliantly. That saved quite a bit of disk space, but above all it got rid of clutter. In my case - with a lot of time lapse photos that I didn’t need anymore - there were some 2,000 images that I allowed PhotoSweeper to trash. When you’ve gone through all the marked an unmarked images and have changed the ones that you weren’t happy with, all you need to do is click the Trash button to see all checked photos be thrown out the window. You can view images that are very much alike side-by-side in this part of the workflow, but in my case I was quite happy with the suggestions PhotoSweeper made. In my opinion, the app gave me an impressive, almost human result - I couldn’t have done a better job. That error accounted for about 90% of the total mistakes it made. The most consistent error the app made was that it wanted to keep JPEGs that weren’t paired with the proper RAW image. ![]() PhotoSweeper managed to “understand” what “lookalike” means correctly about 95% of the time. You can then check images in the large thumbnail view (they’re grouped together in what PhotoSweeper thinks are series of lookalikes) and check them if necessary - or check the ones you think the app wrongly wants to keep. ![]() After comparing the photos, the app marks the images it thinks are duplicates or near-duplicates. I found that quite impressive, certainly in view of the results. My 6,500+ photos got compared in under 10 minutes (iMac mid-2011 i5/16GB). Once you’re happy with the way everything is et up, you press the Compare button. As it turned out, at least with my image collection, the default settings gave me excellent results. If you want to, you can change the bitmap size (at the cost of memory consumption), the interval, RGB sensitivity and other parameters to fine-tune the process. I left all control sliders to their default settings as well. I decided to go with the default setting, which is Time + Bitmap - the interval between photos would be taken into account in addition to a visual likeness. Other methods introduce some form of “fuzziness” as these resemble more or less the way you would yourself compare photos. ![]() Duplicates only will find exact duplicates on a byte-per-byte basis. After cataloguing, you can first decide which algorithm you want to use. The cataloguing process went smoothly and didn’t take too much time. You can save that catalogue and come back to it later if you wish, which is great because the app will intelligently compare your images, but in the end you’ll need to decide whether you want to trash images or not - you have the last word. The program first creates a catalogue of all your images, internally creating small size bitmaps for later processing (you don’t get to see those they serve only as representations of your images for easy comparison). I had a collection of over 6,500 images to compare, and to see how PhotoSweeper behaved when it has to go through that many possible lookalikes, I processed them all at once. This means PhotoSweeper would compare JPEGs to JPEGs and RAW images to RAW. That proved to be as easy as advertised: there’s a Preference setting that allows you to compare only within the same image format. While testing PhotoSweeper with this setup, I was particularly interested in how it would treat these RAW/JPEG pairs. When I offload a memory card, I ingest the RAW and JPEG image pairs to a folder and add pre-defined metadata using Photo Mechanic. I use the Photo Mechanic image browser ( reviewed here), which keeps your images in the folders you define. If you don’t use Lightroom or Aperture, you can just open folders or drag and drop images to PhotoSweeper. Working with PhotoSweeper can be incredibly simple: using the app, open your Aperture or Lightroom library and have it search for duplicates, or near-duplicates based on time interval or by comparing histograms or visual correspondence (pixels are alike). PhotoSweeper assists you when cleaning out your image database. How do you get rid of those duplicates and near-duplicates? Doing it manually is one possible cure, but it’s a lot better for your nerves if you do it with the help of an app. This advantage is also a disadvantage: you risk stuffing your disk with useless images you’ll probably never going to use. One of the advantages of digital photography is that you can shoot as many photos of the same subject as you like without worrying too much about composition or, in the case of action photography, of whether your subject was in focus all the time. ![]() |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |